It is just as well that James Lovelock is a patient man; undeterred by any amount of criticism and/or ridicule. Personally, I was very sceptical of his Gaia hypothesis up until only a few years ago, when the BBC first broadcast their excellent "Earth Story" series presented by Sir Aubrey Manning. I suspect that I was not the only one to watch it that said to themselves, "Wow, so there is solid evidence for the Earth being a self-regulating entity after all!"
Prior to this, as a Christian and a geologist who rejects tortological arguments based on the anthropic principle (i.e. "the universe is the way it is because we are here to observe it"), I had regarded James Lovelock's ideas merely as another clever atheistic attempt to explain the contingent nature of our existence (i.e. "it needn't have been this way at all"). However, now it would seem that the Gaia hypothesis is an idea whose time has finally come.
Having developed an interest in the fundamental influence that geology has on landscape at an early age, my main motivation for having pursued a career in hydrogeology was and is the belief that we have been entrusted with the job of looking after our planet. So, I for one should like to apologise to James Lovelock for having regarded his ideas with suspicion for so long and, I suspect, along with many others, hope that the global village community has finally woken-up to the reality of our culpability in the phenomenon of climate change, and our responsibility for doing something about it.
Therefore, the publication - and general acceptance - of the Stern Report has come not a moment too soon. The only remaining question now is, "How long will James Lovelock have to wait for his Knighthood?"
Martin C. Lack Bsc(Hons) MSc CGeol FGS
www.geosus.org.uk
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment